Le modèle de particules lagrangien open source LAPMOD intègre désormais l'effet de courant descendant des bâtiments dans son algorithme grâce à PRIME2. Conçu spécialement pour les odeurs, il traite le courant descendant au niveau des particules pour les sources ponctuelles, surfaciques et volumétriques, rend superflue la prétraitement BPIP et évite les cavités à « concentration constante » peu réalistes pouvant apparaître avec des schémas plus anciens.

   Les impacts olfactifs sont principalement déterminés par ce qui se passe dans les premières dizaines, voire centaines, de mètres autour de la source. Dans ce champ proche, les bâtiments peuvent forcer les panaches vers le bas, accentuer la turbulence et créer des zones de recirculation qui affectent fortement les concentrations au niveau du sol au niveau des récepteurs voisins. Si un modèle de dispersion se trompe sur le sillage des bâtiments, il peut facilement sous-estimer ou surestimer les concentrations mêmes qui déterminent si les riverains se plaignent ou non. Le choix du schéma de courant descendant est donc crucial pour les évaluations olfactives autour des stations d’épuration, des installations de compostage, des sites de transformation alimentaire et d’autres installations à la configuration complexe.

There is no translation available.

calpuff recommended model EPA   The website of the Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling (SCRAM) no longer includes the CALPUFF model as a recommended dispersion model. This means that one of the most widely dispersion model used for odour modelling is not recommended by the US EPA any more. This decision has serious consequences for the odour community.

   The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) originally published the Guideline on Air Quality Models in 1978. Since then, a few revisions of the Guideline have been carried out. In 2003, this Guideline was modified to include CALPUFF as one of the preferred model. This model was removed from the "preferred list" in May, 22 2017 (and now from the website). allegedly due to concerns about its capabilities to deal with long-range transportation of pollutants. This is no argument to exclude this model from the recommended list, as it is widely used for other purposes, different from long-range transportation. For example, when dealing with the calculation of the odour impact of a facility.

There is no translation available.

CALPUFF 2003 2019

   Dispersion modelling is a key element of most odour assessments around the world. There are 2 or 3 well known dispersion models developed for regulatory assessments of which the most well-known are, AERMOD and CALPUFF. Because both models have been US EPA guideline models until CALPUFF was recently removed in 2017, they are routinely used in most air quality and odour assessments.

   This article highlights the history and background behind CALPUFF and, the reason for its removal as a US EPA guideline model. Concerns with AERMOD for odour assessments will be presented in a separate document, Part 2.

Jennifer Barclay

Atmospheric Science Global (ASG). Auckland, New Zealand

 

Plus d'articles...

All the content here under Creative Commons license